Meta-analysis of total versus partial graft excision: Which is the better choice to manage arteriovenous dialysis graft infection?

5Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous graft infection (AVGI) is a major cause of hemodialysis access failure. Delayed diagnosis and inappropriate treatment may lead to increased morbidity (3-35%) and mortality up to 12%. OBJECTIVES: Compare the postoperative outcomes of total graft excision (TGE) and partial graft excision (PGE) in the treatment of AVGI. DESIGNS: Systematic review and meta-analysis METHODS: The dataset was defined by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane database for articles outlining the terms arteriovenous graft infection, infected dialysis graft, TGE and PGE published between 1995-2020. The data analysis evaluated the outcomes of TGE and PGE in the management of AVGI. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager Software version 5.4.1. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 30-day mortality, recurrent infection, and reoperation rate. SAMPLE SIZE: Eight studies, including 555 AVGI, and 528 patients. RESULTS: PGE showed a significant increase in recurrent graft infection rate (OR=0.23,95% CI=0.13–0.41, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tullavardhana, T., & Chartkitchareon, A. (2022). Meta-analysis of total versus partial graft excision: Which is the better choice to manage arteriovenous dialysis graft infection? Annals of Saudi Medicine, 42(5), 343–350. https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2022.343

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free