What Works for Active Labor Market Policies? A Meta-Analysis of RCT Findings

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The past 10 years have witnessed a flurry of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) that shed new light on the impact and cost-effectiveness of Active Labor Market Policies (ALMPs) that aim to improve workers´ access to new jobs and better wages. This paper presents the first systematic review of 102 ALMP RCTs comprising a total of 668 estimated impacts. We find that (i) a third of these estimates are positive and statistically significant (PSS) at conventional levels; (ii) programs are more likely to yield positive results when GDP growth is higher and unemployment is lower; (iii) programs aimed at building human capital, such as vocational training, independent worker assistance and wage subsidies, show significant positive impact; and (iv) program length, monetary incentives, individualized follow up and activity targeting are all key features in determining the effectiveness of the interventions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yeyati, E. L., Montané, M., Sartorio, L., & Gauna, A. (2025). What Works for Active Labor Market Policies? A Meta-Analysis of RCT Findings. Economia, 24(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.31389/eco.450

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free