Imperfect gold standards for biomarker evaluation

25Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background Serum creatinine has been used as the diagnostic test for acute kidney injury (AKI) for decades despite having imperfect sensitivity and specificity. Novel tubular injury biomarkers may revolutionize the diagnosis of KI; however, even if a novel tubular injury biomarker is 100% sensitive and 100% specific, it may appear inaccurate when using serum creatinine as the gold standard. Conclusions In general, the apparent diagnostic performance of a biomarker depends not only on its ability to detect injury but also on disease prevalence and the sensitivity and specificity of the imperfect gold standard. Apparent errors in diagnosis using a new biomarker may be a reflection of errors in the imperfect gold standard itself rather than poor performance of the biomarker. Clinical Trials 2013; 10: 696700. http://ctj.sagepub.com. © The Author(s), 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Waikar, S. S., Betensky, R. A., Emerson, S. C., & Bonventre, J. V. (2013). Imperfect gold standards for biomarker evaluation. In Clinical Trials (Vol. 10, pp. 696–700). https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774513497540

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free