Classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response

5Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Knowing the difficulty of a given task is crucial for improving the learning outcomes. This paper studies the difficulty level classification of memorization tasks from pupillary response data. Developing a difficulty level classifier from pupil size features is challenging because of the inter-subject variability of pupil responses. Eye-tracking data used in this study was collected while students solved different memorization tasks divided as low-, medium-, and high-level. Statistical analysis shows that values of pupillometric features (as peak dilation, pupil diameter change, and suchlike) differ significantly for different difficulty levels. We used a wrapper method to select the pupillometric features that work the best for the most common classifiers; Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and Random Forest (RF). Despite the statistical difference, experiments showed that a random forest classifier trained with five features obtained the best F1-score (82%). This result is essential because it describes a method to evaluate the cognitive load of a subject performing a task using only pupil size features.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mitre-Hernandez, H., Sanchez-Rodriguez, J., Nava-Muñoz, S., & Lara-Alvarez, C. (2022). Classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response. PeerJ, 10. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12864

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free