Characterization of US Hospital Advertising and Association with Hospital Performance, 2008-2016

3Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Importance: Hospital advertising has been touted as a tool to improve consumer decision-making, but little is known about its association with objective measures of hospital quality. Objective: To document recent trends in hospital advertising in the US and examine the association between concurrent measures of hospital advertising and quality. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cross-sectional study of all general acute care hospitals operating in the US between January 2008 and December 2016. Data were analyzed from December 6, 2019, to July 15, 2020. Exposure: Annualized advertising spending for each hospital as measured by a market research firm. Main Outcomes and Measures: Four composites of hospital performance from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital Compare database were used: risk-standardized mortality rate, risk-standardized readmission rate, Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers & Systems (CAHPS) Overall Patient Experience Rating (scale of 1-5; higher scores indicate a more positive patient experience rating), and overall 5-star rating. Linear models adjusted for hospital bed size, hospital revenue, and geographic census region. Results: The study sample included, on average, 4569 general acute care hospitals per year between 2008 and 2016. During this time, approximately half of acute care hospitals (2239 of 4569 [49%]) advertised their services to consumers and spent a total of $3.39 billion. Relative to hospitals that never advertised, advertising hospitals were more likely to be nonprofit facilities (mean [SD], 66% [47%] vs 51% [50%]; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ndumele, C. D., Cohen, M. S., Solberg, M., Lollo, A., & Wallace, J. (2021). Characterization of US Hospital Advertising and Association with Hospital Performance, 2008-2016. JAMA Network Open, 4(7). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15342

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free