Influence of Abutments Surface (machined vs. laser-microgrooved) in Soft-tissue Response During One Year of Function: Clinical and Biochemical Outcomes of a RCT with Split-Mouth Design

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate peri-implant soft tissue response by assessing IL-6, IL-1b and MMP-8 levels in peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) around machined vs. laser-microgrooved implants/healing/prosthetic abutments during 1 year of function. Twenty-four patients each received 2 one-stage implants in a split mouth design on the same jaw. In each patient, one implant, one immediate healing, and one prosthetic abutment with a machined surface (M group), and one implant, one immediate healing abutment and one prosthetic abutment with a laser-microgrooved surface (LMS group) were used. PICF sampling, pocket probing depths (PPD) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were assessed at 1, 3, and 12 months. IL-6, IL-1b and MMP-8 levels were determined by specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay systems (ELISA). Repeated measure ANOVA was used to run comparisons with groups and between groups months at 1, 3, and 12 months. At 3 and 12 months, the LMS group showed significantly lower PD, BOP and IL-6, IL-1β and MMP-8 levels than the M group (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guarnieri, R., Zanza, A., Reda, R., Pagnoni, F., Abbagnale, R., Di Nardo, D., & Testarelli, L. (2024). Influence of Abutments Surface (machined vs. laser-microgrooved) in Soft-tissue Response During One Year of Function: Clinical and Biochemical Outcomes of a RCT with Split-Mouth Design. Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences, 26(3), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2024.59827

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free