Abstract
Objective: To compare prevalences of intestinal helminths and waterborne protozoa in indigenous and settler populations in a remote area of Peru. These populations live in adjacent but segregated small urban villages. Methods: Stool samples were collected from representative members of these two populations and analysed for geohelminths and protozoa. Results: The risk of soil-transmitted helminths is significantly higher in the settler than the indigenous population in the same isolated region of Peru (OR 5.18; 95% CI 3.44-7.81; P < 0.001). In contrast, the rates of protozoa presence were similar in both populations (OR 1.28; 95% CI 0.77-2.14; P = 0.336). Conclusions: Potential explanations for unexpected finding of a lower prevalence of helminths in indigenous relative to the settler population could include housing design in flood - prone areas and the use of local medicinal plants that possibly have antihelmintic properties. © 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Briones-Chávez, C., Torres-Zevallos, H., Canales, M., Stamato, C. M., O’Riordan, T. G., & Terashima, A. (2013). Differences in prevalence of geohelminth infections between indigenous and settler populations in a remote Amazonian region of Peru. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 18(5), 615–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12077
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.