Comparison between the stiffness method and the hybrid method applied to a circular ring

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study deals with the comparison of stresses and displacements of a circular ring obtained by two numerical formulations, namely the stiffness method and the hybrid method, applied to isoparametric quadrilateral elements. After explaining the formulation of the hybrid method in finite elements, an orthogonalization method proposed previously for hybrid elements is applied. Then, the computational cost per element of the stiffness method and of the hybrid method with and without orthogonalization has been evaluated for the first time. A circular ring loaded by two opposing forces is analyzed in order to compare the solution obtained by the hybrid method and the stiffness method with experimental and analytical results. The agreement between analytical and experimental results with those numerical is better in the case of the hybrid method than in the case of the stiffness method. It is observed that the element ratio needed to obtain a given relative error is one magnitude order greater in the stiffness method than in the case of the hybrid method.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Insausti, N., Adarraga, I., Urruzola, J., & Mujika, F. (2018). Comparison between the stiffness method and the hybrid method applied to a circular ring. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1013-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free