COVID-Apps: Misdirecting Public Health Attention in a Pandemic

8Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

When there is no vaccine for a disease, ‘Test, Trace, Treat/Isolate’ is the public health go-to directive. During the COVID-19 pandemic, mobile phone apps are designed to improve on this. But COVID-apps have not been effective as a public health tool. Countries spend millions to develop them, yet they have been shown to have terrible return on investment. This commentary explores why COVID-apps are generally championed and provides three brief case studies (Germany, Sierra Leone, Canada) of non-app public health success. In conclusion, I argue that we need to get our public health care priorities straight: Better and more testing; increased investment in manual contact tracing and treatments; hospitalization when necessary; and wrap-around care – assistance with groceries, cleaning, child- or eldercare responsibilities, telehealth doctor appointment hookups – for sick people in home isolation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Erikson, S. (2021). COVID-Apps: Misdirecting Public Health Attention in a Pandemic. Global Policy, 12(S6), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12888

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free