Comparison of the urine leukocyte esterase test to a nucleic acid amplification test for screening non-health care-seeking male soldiers for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections

7Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We evaluated the Leukocyte Esterase Test (LET) as a screening tool by testing urine from 1,438 non-health care-seeking male Army basic trainees with LET and a Nucleic Acid Amplification Test. Compared to Nucleic Acid Amplification Test results, LET sensitivity and specificity for detection of chlamydia and gonorrhea were 45.8% and 97.4%, and 60.0% and 96.2%, respectively. The prevalence of chlamydia and gonorrhea was 3.3% and 0.3%, respectively. In this population, the prevalence of gonorrhea was too low to produce reliable estimates of performance characteristics of the LET for gonorrhea. The LET is not warranted for use in screening non-health care-seeking male Army trainees.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wood, B. J., Gaydos, J. C., McKee, K. T., & Gaydos, C. A. (2007). Comparison of the urine leukocyte esterase test to a nucleic acid amplification test for screening non-health care-seeking male soldiers for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections. Military Medicine, 172(7), 770–772. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED.172.7.770

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free