Doing justice to the political: The international criminal court in Uganda and Sudan

223Citations
Citations of this article
109Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

International criminal justice has become a weapon in political struggles in Uganda and Sudan. In this light, this article discusses the political meaning of the International Criminal Court's judicial interventions. It argues that the ICC, presented by its advocates as a legal bastion immune from politics, is inherently political by making a distinction between the friends and enemies of the international community which it purports to represent. Using original empirical data, the article demonstrates how in both Uganda and Sudan warring parties have used the ICC's intervention to brand opponents as hostis humani generis, or enemies of mankind, and to present themselves as friends of the ICC, and thus friends of the international community. The ICC Prosecutor has at times encouraged this friend-enemy dichotomy. These observations do not result in a denunciation of the Court as a 'political institution'. On the contrary: they underline that a sound normative evaluation of the Court's activities can be made only when its political dimensions are acknowledged and understood. © EJIL 2011; all rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nouwen, S. M. H., & Werner, W. G. (2010). Doing justice to the political: The international criminal court in Uganda and Sudan. European Journal of International Law, 21(4), 941–965. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chq064

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free