Does science writing heuristic increase secondary school students' argumentation skills?

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Argumentation plays an important role to build and develop students' conceptual understanding and critical thinking skill. Factually, argumentation at secondary school is less scientific because of the lack of scientific discussion content. Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) is a solution because it offers direct observation and comprising experiments at laboratory. It also shapes students' conception like a scientist. The research aims to implement SWH on environmental pollution learning and observe its effect on students' argumentation skill. It applied quasi experiment method with 36 7TH grade students as a research subject. The result showed that students' argumentation contain claim, and warrant. It means SWH plays important role to build and increase students' argumentation on environmental pollution.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Daningsih, A., Purwianingsih, W., & Yuliani, G. (2019). Does science writing heuristic increase secondary school students’ argumentation skills? In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1318). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012072

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free