Understanding the likelihood and consequences of post-closure criticality in a geological disposal facility

  • Winsley R
  • Baldwin T
  • Hicks T
  • et al.
4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A geological disposal facility (GDF) will include fissile materials that could, under certain conditions, lead to criticality. Demonstration of criticality safety therefore forms an important part of a GDF's safety case.Containment provided by the waste package will contribute to criticality safety during package transport and the GDF operational phase. The GDF multiple-barrier system will ensure that criticality is prevented for some time after facility closure. However, on longer post-closure timescales, conditions in the GDF will evolve and it is necessary to demonstrate: an understanding of the conditions under which criticality could occur; the likelihood of such conditions occurring; and the consequences of criticality should it occur.Work has addressed disposal of all of the UK's higher-activity wastes in three illustrative geologies. This paper, however, focuses on presenting results to support safe disposal of spent fuel, plutonium and highlyenriched uranium in higher-strength rock.The results support a safety case assertion that post-closure criticality is of low likelihood and, if it was to occur, the consequences would be tolerable.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Winsley, R. J., Baldwin, T. D., Hicks, T. W., Mason, R. M., & Smith, P. N. (2015). Understanding the likelihood and consequences of post-closure criticality in a geological disposal facility. Mineralogical Magazine, 79(6), 1551–1561. https://doi.org/10.1180/minmag.2015.079.6.30

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free