Purpose: The objective of this randomized, double-blind, controlled crossover trial was to compare 0.1% timolol hydrogel formulation eyedrops with 0.5% timolol aqueous solution in terms of systemic effects, hypotensive efficacy and pharmacodynamics. Methods: Twenty-four healthy subjects underwent careful ocular, cardiovascular and pulmonary function evaluation before and after 2 weeks of topical treatment with 0.1% timolol hydrogel or 0.5% aqueous timolol maleate. Intraocular pressure (IOP), heart rate, blood pressure, forced expiratory volume and plasma levels of timolol were measured. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the systemic absorption of timolol between these two ophthalmic timolol solutions. The peak concentration and mean area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (AUC) were about 10-fold higher after 0.5% timolol aqueous solution. The mean peak heart rate during exercise was reduced by 19 bpm (SD 6.4 bpm) after 0.5% timolol aqueous solution and by only 4.6 bpm (SD 3.8 bpm) after 0.1% timolol hydrogel (p < 0.0001). There was no difference between the two formulations in efficacy in reducing IOP. No differences between treatments were found in respect of pulmonary function. Conclusions: The lower timolol concentration in the hydrogel vehicle and its better bioavailability resulted in reduced systemic absorption and side-effects without loss of efficacy. Copyright © Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2005.
CITATION STYLE
Uusitalo, H., Niño, J., Tahvanainen, K., Turjanmaa, V., Ropo, A., Touminen, J., & Kähönen, M. (2005). Efficacy and systemic side-effects of topical 0.5% timolol aqueous solution and 0.1% timolol hydrogel. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, 83(6), 723–728. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00562.x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.