Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine staffing and practice patterns for afterhours endoscopy service in Canada METHODS: A link to a web-based survey was sent by e-mail to all clinical members of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology in February 2011. A priori, it was planned to compare variations in practice among gastroenterologists (GIs) performing endoscopy in different regions of Canada, between pediatric and adult GIs, and between university and community hospitals. RESULTS: Of 422 potential respondents, 168 (40%) responded. Of the 139 adult GIs, 61% performed after-hours endoscopy in the endoscopy suite where daytime procedures were performed, 62% had a trained endoscopy nurse available for all procedures, 38% had access to propofol sedation, 12% reprocessed the endoscopes themselves or with the help of a resident, 4% had out-of-hospital patients come directly to their endoscopy suite and 53% were highly satisfied. The adult endoscopists practising at community hospitals were more likely to have an anesthetist attend the procedure. Regional differences were noted, with more involvement of anesthetists (13%) and availability of propofol (50%) in Ontario, more frequent reprocessing of endoscopes in the central reprocessing units in British Columbia (78%) and almost universal availability of a trained endoscopy nurse (96%) with concomitant higher endoscopist satisfaction (84% highly satisfied) in Alberta. CONCLUSIONS: More than one-third of surveyed endoscopists across the country do not have a trained endoscopy nurse to assist in after-hours endoscopy - the time period when urgent patients often present and typically require therapeutic endoscopic interventions. There are significant regional differences in the practice of after-hours endoscopy in Canada. ©2012 Pulsus Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Muthiah, K. C., Enns, R., Armstrong, D., Noble, A., Gray, J., Sinclair, P., … Singh, H. (2012). A survey of the practice of after-hours and emergency endoscopy in Canada. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology, 26(12), 871–876. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/951071
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.