Comparison of circle absorber and jacksonrees systems for paediatric anaesthesia

19Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To evaluate effects of anaesthesia delivery systems on respiratory work in infants, we measured end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2), transcutaneous PCO2 (PtcCO2) respiratory rate and arterial blood gases in infants (ages 0.2 to 23.8 months) anaesthetised with either a Jackson-Rees (n = 11) or paediatric circle absorber system (n = 15). Two hours after induction, with assisted ventilation there was no difference in PEtCO2, PtcCO2, respiratory rate, pH or PaCO2 in infants anaesthetised with either system. In the laboratory, we measured inspiratory and expiratory resistances to breathing through each system at various tidal volumes and total gas flows into the circuit. These values were compared to resistances created by breathing through an appropriately sized endotracheal tube. Although there was lower resistance to ventilation through Jackson-Rees system, both systems had lower resistances for almost all flows tested than breathing through an endotracheal tube alone (p < 0.05). The paediatric circle absorber system is an efficient apparatus for anaesthetising spontaneously breathing infants. © 1988 Canadian Anesthesiologists.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rasch, D. K., Bunegin, L., Ledbetter, J., & Kaminskas, D. (1988). Comparison of circle absorber and jacksonrees systems for paediatric anaesthesia. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 35(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03010540

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free