The effect of multiple wire localization in breast conservation

10Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Variability exists regarding the surgical technique in breast conservation therapy. The purpose of this project was to determine differences between single (SH) or flanking (FH) hooked needle localization wires used for nonpalpable breast lesions. We retrospectively reviewed 201 female patients at a single institution from 2004 to 2008. All patients had biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive disease. Comparisons were made in regard to margin status, reoperation, completion mastectomy, size of lesion, and breast specimen volume. SHwas placed in 122 patients (61%) and FH in 79 patients (39%). In SH, 23 patients (18%) had positive margins and 31 patients (25%) had reoperations as compared with 31 patients (25%) with positive margin and 36 patients (44%) in the FH cohort (P = 0.039 and 0.0037). Average lesion size and volume resected was 1.5 cm and 137 cm 3in SH and 2.85 cm and 188 cm 3 in FH, respectively (P = 0.0001 and 0.006). Positive margins were associated with lesion size and not volume of tissue excised. The FH technique was associated with more positive margins, reoperation, and completion mastectomy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fillion, M. M., Black, E. A., Hudson, K. B., Morin-Ducote, G., Bell, J. L., Gray, K. D., & Lewis, J. M. (2012). The effect of multiple wire localization in breast conservation. American Surgeon, 78(5), 519–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481207800530

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free