Reducing Literature Screening Workload with Machine Learning: A Systematic Review of Tools and Their Performance

34Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In our era of accelerated accumulation of knowledge, the manual screening of literature for eligibility is increasingly becoming too labor-intensive for summarizing the current state of knowledge in a timely manner. Recent advances in machine learning and natural language processing promise to reduce the screening workload by automatically detecting unseen references with a high probability of inclusion. As a variety of tools have been developed, the current review provides an overview of their characteristics and performance. A systematic search in various databases yielded 488 eligible reports, revealing 15 tools for screening automation that differed in methodology, features, and accessibility. For the review on the performance of screening tools, 21 studies could be included. In comparison to sampling records randomly, active screening with prioritization approximately halves the screening workload. However, a comparison of tools under equal or at least similar conditions is needed to derive clear recommendations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burgard, T., & Bittermann, A. (2023, February 1). Reducing Literature Screening Workload with Machine Learning: A Systematic Review of Tools and Their Performance. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology. Hogrefe Verlag GmbH & Co. KG. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000509

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free