Flap Neurotization in Breast Reconstruction with Nerve Allografts: 1-year Clinical Outcomes

29Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Autologous breast reconstruction is widely regarded as the gold standard approach following mastectomy. However, the lack of sensation continues to present a reconstructive challenge. In this study, clinical outcomes following abdominal flap neurotization with processed human nerve allograft were investigated. Methods: In this prospective analysis, patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction with (Group 1) or without (Group 2) abdominal flap neurotization at a single institution were investigated. Processed human nerve allograft (Avance, AxoGen, Alachua, Fla.) was used in all cases of flap neurotization. Only patients with a follow-up of ≥12 months were included. Cutaneous pressure threshold was tested using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments (SWMF) at 9 pre-defined locations. Results: A total of 59 patients (96 breasts) were enrolled into the registry. Of these, 22 patients (Group 1: N = 15, 22 breasts; Group 2: N = 7, 14 breasts) had a complete data set with ≥12 months follow-up. Measuring cutaneous pressure thresholds, we observed a greater likelihood for return of protective sensation (SWMF ≤ 4.31) in neurotized breasts in 8 of the 9 examined zones. Additionally, flap neurotization was associated with a greater likelihood for return of protective sensation in the majority of the reconstructed breast - that is, ≥5 zones (55% versus 7%; P < 0.01). Conclusion: Flap neurotization using processed nerve allograft resulted in a greater degree of return of protective sensation to the reconstructed breast than reconstructions without neurotization at ≥12 months.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Momeni, A., Meyer, S., Shefren, K., & Januszyk, M. (2021). Flap Neurotization in Breast Reconstruction with Nerve Allografts: 1-year Clinical Outcomes. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open, 9(1), E3328. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003328

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free