Empowerment: Through the smoke and past the mirrors?

23Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

This paper offers a five-fold typology for empowerment, which is intended to make it easier to assess and develop empowerment initiatives in a climate where much rhetoric surrounds the term. A real-world organizational sketch for each type follows an initial theoretical description and aphorism. The implications for HRD practitioners of each type of empowerment are also outlined. No exclusive or definitional treatment is offered for what we feel to be an elastic term. Instead, the framework is held up as a potential catalyst for provoking ideas about empowerment, or grouping existing ideas on how to empower. We sympathize with those who feel the term is redundant because it has been subsumed by the 'developmental rhetoric' (Clutterbuck 1998), and recognize that such rhetoric can be a barrier to change and learning (Harrison 1997). Nonetheless, we argue that, instead of abandoning the term empowerment altogether, it can be beneficial to see what has been accomplished under the existing banner. © 2002 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morrell, K., & Wilkinson, A. (2002). Empowerment: Through the smoke and past the mirrors? Human Resource Development International, 5(1), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860110057647

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free