Rectification of width and area of the ciliary cleft in dogs

13Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The width and area of the ciliary cleft (CCW and CCA) according to ultrasound biomicroscopy was rectified to compare dogs of different body sizes/weights, including toy breed (TBG), small breed (SBG), medium breed (MBG) and large/giant breed groups (LGBG). A linear correlation was detected between the natural log of body weight and the ocular axial length (OAL) reflecting the ocular size (OS; r=0.81, p<0.001). A significant positive correlation was found between OAL and the distance of the Schwalbe's line to the anterior lenticular capsule (SLD; r=0.87, p<0.001), suggesting that SLD could rectify canine OS. Rectified CCW (r-CCW) and CCA (r-CCA) were calculated using SLD and fixed SLD as the SLD mean (SLDM). The SLDM was 2.55 mm in this study, and r-CCW and r-CCA were calculated as r-CCW = CCW × (2.55/SLD) and r-CCA = CCA × (2.55/SLD)2. The CCW values of TBG, SBG and MBG were narrower than those of LGBG (p<0.05). There were significant statistical differences in CCA between all groups other than TBG and SBG (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in r-CCW and r-CCA in any of the groups. In addition, CCW/SLD did not show significant changes in dogs with different body sizes/weights. These results suggested that r-CCW, r-CCA and CCW/SLD can be used for comparison between dogs of different body sizes/weights.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kawata, M., Tsukizawa, H., Nakayama, M., & Hasegawa, T. (2010). Rectification of width and area of the ciliary cleft in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 72(5), 533–537. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.09-0507

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free