Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter vs talc pleurodesis on hospitalization days in patients with malignant pleural effusion: The AMPLE randomized clinical trial

247Citations
Citations of this article
305Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Indwelling pleural catheter and talc pleurodesis are established treatments for malignant pleural effusions among patients with poor prognosis. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether indwelling pleural catheters are more effective than talc pleurodesis in reducing total hospitalization days in the remaining lifespan of patients with malignant pleural effusion. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This open-label, randomized clinical trial included participants recruited from 9 centers in Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, and Hong Kong between July 2012 and October 2014; they were followed up for 12 months (study end date: October 16, 2015). Patients (n = 146) with symptomatic malignant pleural effusion who had not undergone indwelling pleural catheter or pleurodesis treatment were included. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized (1:1) to indwelling pleural catheter (n = 74) or talc pleurodesis (n = 72), minimized by malignancy (mesothelioma vs others) and trapped lung (vs not), and stratified by region (Australia vs Asia). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the total number of days spent in hospital from procedure to death or to 12 months. Secondary outcomes included further pleural interventions, patient-reported breathlessness, quality-of-life measures, and adverse events. RESULTS: Among 146 randomized patients (median age, 70.5 years; 56.2% male), 2 were excluded. The indwelling pleural catheter group spent significantly fewer days in hospital than the pleurodesis group. The reduction was mainly in effusion-related hospitalization days. Fewer patients randomized to indwelling pleural catheter required further ipsilateral invasive pleural drainages. There were no significant between-group differences in improvements in breathlessness or quality of life. Adverse events occurred in both groups: 30 events in 22 catheter patients and 23 events in 13 talc pleurodesis patients. (Table Presented). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with malignant pleural effusion, treatment with an indwelling pleural catheter vs talc pleurodesis resulted in fewer hospitalization days from treatment to death, but the magnitude of the difference is of uncertain clinical importance. These findings may help inform patient choice of management for pleural effusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12611000567921.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thomas, R., Fysh, E. T. H., Smith, N. A., Lee, P., Kwan, B. C. H., Yap, E., … Lee, Y. C. G. (2017). Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter vs talc pleurodesis on hospitalization days in patients with malignant pleural effusion: The AMPLE randomized clinical trial. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, 318(19), 1903–1912. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.17426

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free