Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to examine differences in fear conditioning between anxious and nonanxious participants in a single large sample. Materials and methods: We employed a remote fear conditioning task (FLARe) to collect data from participants from the Twins Early Development Study (n = 1,146; 41% anxious vs. 59% nonanxious). Differences between groups were estimated for their expectancy of an aversive outcome towards a reinforced conditional stimulus (CS+) and an unreinforced conditional stimulus (CS−) during acquisition and extinction phases. Results: During acquisition, the anxious group (vs. nonanxious group) showed greater expectancy towards the CS−. During extinction, the anxious group (vs. nonanxious group) showed greater expectancy to both CSs. These comparisons yielded effect size estimates (d = 0.26–0.34) similar to those identified in previous meta-analyses. Conclusion: The current study demonstrates that remote fear conditioning can be used to detect differences between groups of anxious and nonanxious individuals, which appear to be consistent with previous meta-analyses including in-person studies.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
McGregor, T., Purves, K. L., Constantinou, E., Baas, J. M. P., Barry, T. J., Carr, E., … Eley, T. C. (2021). Large-scale remote fear conditioning: Demonstration of associations with anxiety using the FLARe smartphone app. Depression and Anxiety, 38(7), 719–730. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.23146
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.