Primary care factors associated with cervical screening coverage in England

41Citations
Citations of this article
135Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme was established to decrease the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in England. Methods: To identify socioeconomic and general practice factors associated with cervical screening coverage in England, a national cross-sectional study was conducted using data on 26 497 476 female patients registered with 7970 practices in 152 English primary care trusts (PCTs). The 2008-09 data on cervical screening coverage rates from the quality and outcomes framework (QOF) database were used with data on QOF indicators, staffing levels and socioeconomic status. Results: The mean cervical screening coverage rate was 78.5 at the PCT level and 83.5 at the practice level. At both levels, cervical screening coverage was significantly negatively associated with the index of multiple deprivation score, percentage of female patients aged 25-49 years and percentage of ethnic minority patients. Also, at the practice level, the percentage of female patients aged 50-64 years, overall QOF score and records and information score were significantly positively associated with cervical screening coverage. Conclusions: Cervical screening coverage was significantly lower in PCTs and practices serving higher percentages of younger-aged women, non-Caucasian individuals and those living in socioeconomic deprivation. It is therefore important to adopt strategies to improve cervical screening coverage in these groups. © 2012 The Author 2012, Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bang, J. Y., Yadegarfar, G., Soljak, M., & Majeed, A. (2012). Primary care factors associated with cervical screening coverage in England. Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom), 34(4), 532–538. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fds019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free