The 100 most-cited papers on age-related macular degeneration: A bibliographic perspective

5Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The 100 most-cited papers on age-related macular degeneration (AMD) were analysed using a bibliographic study. The bibliographic databases of the Institute for Scientific Information Web of Knowledge were searched, limited to research articles published between 1965 and 2020 in peer-reviewed journals. The papers were ranked in order of number of citations since publication. Five of the top 10 (and 3 of the top 4) papers reported randomised clinical trial results for either anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents or nutritional supplements. Four of the top 10 papers reported genotype-phenotype associations between AMD and variants in Complement Factor H. This bibliographic study provides perspective and insight into many of the most influential contributions in the understanding and management of AMD and its evolution over time.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grzybowski, A., Shtayer, C., Schwartz, S. G., & Moisseiev, E. (2021, July 5). The 100 most-cited papers on age-related macular degeneration: A bibliographic perspective. BMJ Open Ophthalmology. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000823

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free