The elephant in the negotiation room: PTAs through the eyes of citizens

12Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In recent years, the negotiation of various trade agreements, such as the TPP, TTIP and CETA, has been accompanied by a large public backlash. Are we observing a paradigm shift in public perception of world trade or just temporary shifts in public support for the global economic order that oscillate around a more or less steady level? This chapter provides an overview of the major determinants of support for or opposition against PTAs and discusses how much room to maneuver policy makers have in designing such agreements. Furthermore, we discuss what policy makers can do to increase support for such agreements. We thereby focus on framing strategies and provide an analysis of which types of arguments are conducive to increase support for PTAs and how individuals process such information. This allows us to construct different future scenarios for policy makers to better align the negotiation and design of future trade agreements with the demand of their constituencies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nguyen, Q., & Spilker, G. (2019). The elephant in the negotiation room: PTAs through the eyes of citizens. In The Shifting Landscape of Global Trade Governance: World Trade Forum (pp. 17–47). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108757683.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free