A comparison of augmentation techniques for reconstruction of the extensor mechanism following proximal tibial replacement in an experimental animal model

3Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We used an in vivo model to assess the use of an autogenous cancellous bone block and marrow graft for augmenting tendon reattachment to metallic implants. We hypothesised that augmentation of the tendon-implant interface with a bone block would enable retention of the graft on the implant surface, enhance biological integration, and result in more consistent functional outcomes compared with previously reported morcellised graft augmentation techniques. A significant improvement in functional weight-bearing was observed between six and 12 weeks. The significant increase in ground reaction force through the operated limb between six and 12 weeks was greater than that reported previously with morcellised graft augmented reconstructions. Histological appearance and collagen fibre orientation with bone block augmentation more closely resembled that of an intact enthesis compared with the morcellised grafting technique. Bone block augmentation of tendon-implant interfaces results in more reliable functional and histological outcomes, with a return to pre-operative levels of weight-bearing by 24 weeks. ©2008 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pendegrass, C. J., Sundar, S., Oddy, M. J., Cannon, S. R., Briggs, T., & Blunn, G. W. (2008). A comparison of augmentation techniques for reconstruction of the extensor mechanism following proximal tibial replacement in an experimental animal model. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B, 90(4), 535–541. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.20345

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free