Two Putative Cryoprotectants do not Provide Frost and Freeze Protection in Tomato and Pepper

  • Perry K
  • Bonanno A
  • Monks D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A commercially available cryoprotectant (50% propylene block copolymer of polyoxyethylene, 50% propylene glycol; trade name FrostFree) and an antitranspirant (96% di-1-p-menthene, i.e., pinolene, a terpenic polymer, 4% inert; trade name Vapor Gard) were evaluated for their ability to protect `Pik Red' tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) and `Keystone Resistant Giant #3' pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants during frost and freeze occurrences in the field. Tests were conducted during four spring and two fall seasons. Protection from these products was not observed under field conditions when minimum air temperature reached -3.5C and -l.0C on separate occasions. Yields for treated and untreated plants were similar. Neither cryoprotectant injured the foliage in the absence of cold events.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Perry, K. B., Bonanno, A. R., & Monks, D. W. (2019). Two Putative Cryoprotectants do not Provide Frost and Freeze Protection in Tomato and Pepper. HortScience, 27(1), 26–27. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.27.1.26

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free