Efficiency of fine-needle aspiration compared with other sampling techniques for laboratory diagnosis of Buruli ulcer disease

9Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In accordance with recent WHO recommendations, this study evaluates the sensitivities of PCR and microscopy for fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus techniques involving swabs and punch biopsy specimens and suggests that FNA can replace punch biopsies for nonulcerative lesions and may serve as an alternative for ulcerative lesions in cases where scarred edges prevent the collection of swabs. Copyright © 2010, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Herbinger, K. H., Beissner, M., Huber, K., Awua-Boateng, N. Y., Nitschke, J., Thompson, W., … Bretzel, G. (2010). Efficiency of fine-needle aspiration compared with other sampling techniques for laboratory diagnosis of Buruli ulcer disease. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 48(10), 3732–3734. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01549-10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free