Sexually transmitted infections and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: results from the Nurses’ Health Studies

41Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are associated with pelvic inflammatory disease and tubal pathologies. Given the tubal origin of a proportion of ovarian cancers, STIs may be relevant in their aetiology. Methods: Antibodies indicating past infection with Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma genitalium, herpes simplex virus type 2, and against human papillomavirus oncogenes (L1 and E6+E7 oncoproteins of types 16, 18, 45) were measured in prediagnosis plasma samples in a nested case–control study in the Nurses’ Health Studies (n = 337 cases 1:1 matched to controls). Logistic regression was used to estimate multivariable-adjusted relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals [CIs] comparing women seropositive vs. seronegative among all cases (invasive and borderline), invasive (n = 257), and invasive serous ovarian cancers; n = 170), and borderline ovarian tumours (n = 80). Results: C. trachomatis seropositivity was associated with higher risk of ovarian cancer overall (RR = 2.07 [1.25–3.43]); results were similar for invasive, invasive serous, and borderline tumours. We observed no associations for the other STIs. Relative to women seronegative to all infections, strongest associations were observed for seropositivity to C. trachomatis plus another STI (2.74 [1.20–6.27]; C. trachomatis alone, 1.88 [1.03–3.42]; all cases); however, the RRs were not significantly different. Conclusions: C. trachomatis infection may increase ovarian cancer risk; additional studies are required.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fortner, R. T., Terry, K. L., Bender, N., Brenner, N., Hufnagel, K., Butt, J., … Tworoger, S. S. (2019). Sexually transmitted infections and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: results from the Nurses’ Health Studies. British Journal of Cancer, 120(8), 855–860. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0422-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free