Neostigmine and pilocarpine attenuated tumour necrosis factor α expression and cardiac hypertrophy in the heart with pressure overload

18Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The inflammatory cytokine tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) is known to be a major factor contributing to cardiac remodelling and dysfunction. Parasympathetic nervous system cholinergic function can inhibit TNFα expression during systemic infection. In the present study, we tested the effects of a cholinesterase inhibitor, neostigmine, and a muscarinic cholinergic agonist, pilocarpine, on cardiac hypertrophy and TNFα levels during pressure overload. Rats with transverse aortic constriction exhibited elevated TNFα protein levels in the heart, increased heart weight to body weight ratios (an index of cardiac hypertrophy) and decreased left ventricular diastolic function. Two weeks of infusion with neostigmine (6 μg kg -1 day-1) or pilocarpine (0.3 mg kg-1 day -1) significantly reduced cardiac hypertrophy, reduced TNFα levels and elevated interleukin-10 levels in heart tissues, and improved ventricular function in rats with transverse aortic constriction. Neither of these treatments significantly changed ventricular pressure load. Furthermore, in primary cultured neonatal cardiac cells, treatment with pilocarpine attenuated adrenergic agonist phenylephrine-induced increased TNFα expression and [3H]leucine (a marker of protein synthesis) incorporation in the cells. Collectively, both cholinergic agents decreased TNFα levels and attenuated cardiac hypertrophy. Since both agents potentially enhanced cholinergic function, the anti-inflammatory action may be involved in the cardioprotective effect of the treatments with these agents. © 2007 The Authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Freeling, J., Wattier, K., LaCroix, C., & Li, Y. F. (2008). Neostigmine and pilocarpine attenuated tumour necrosis factor α expression and cardiac hypertrophy in the heart with pressure overload. Experimental Physiology, 93(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1113/expphysiol.2007.039784

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free