A comparison of global flood models using Sentinel-1 and a change detection approach

Abstract

Advances in numerical algorithms, improvement of computational power and progress in remote sensing have led to the development of global flood models (GFMs), which promise to be a useful tool for large-scale flood risk management. However, performance and reliability of GFMs, especially in data-scarce regions, is still uncertain, as they are difficult to validate. Here we aim at contributing to develop alternative, more flexible, and consistent methods for GFM validation by applying a change detection analysis on synthetic aperture radar (CD-SAR) imagery obtained from the Sentinel-1 imagery, on a cloud-based geospatial analysis platform. The study addresses two main objectives. First, to validate four widely adopted GFMs with flood maps generated through the proposed CD-SAR approach. This exercise was conducted for eight different large river basins on four continents, to account for a diverse range of hydro-climatic environments. Second, to compare CD-SAR-derived flood maps with those obtained from alternative remote sensing sources. These comparative results offer valuable insights into the reliability of CD-SAR data as a validation tool, more specifically how it stacks up against flood maps generated by other remote sensing techniques.