Internal fixation versus other surgical methods for treating distal radius fractures in adults

3Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To compare the effects (benefits and harms) of internal fixation versus other methods of surgical intervention (percutaneous pinning; external fixation) for distal radius fractures in adults. Our main comparisons will be: internal fixation versus method of surgery that is not internal fixation; i.e. percutaneous pinning or external fixation or a combination of these two methods internal fixation versus percutaneous pinning internal fixation versus external fixation

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jariwala, A. C., Phillips, A. R., Storey, P. A., Nuttall, D., & Watts, A. C. (2014). Internal fixation versus other surgical methods for treating distal radius fractures in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2014(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011212

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free