Black hole complementarity with local horizons and Horowitz-Maldacena's proposal

  • Hong S
  • Hwang D
  • Yeom D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To implement the consistent black hole complementarity principle, we need two assumptions: first, there exists a singularity near the center, and second, global horizons are the same as local horizons. However, these assumptions are not true in general. In this paper, the authors study a charged black hole in which the second assumption may not hold. From the previous simulations, we have argued that the event horizon is quite close to the outer horizon, and it seems not harmful to black hole complementarity; however, the Cauchy horizon can be different from the inner horizon, and a violation of complementarity will be possible. To maintain complementarity, we need to assume a selection principle between the singularity and the Hawking radiation generating surface; we suggest that Horowitz-Maldacena's proposal can be useful for this purpose. Finally, we discussed some conditions under which the selection principle may not work.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hong, S. E., Hwang, D., Yeom, D., & Zoe, H. (2008). Black hole complementarity with local horizons and Horowitz-Maldacena’s proposal. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2008(12), 080–080. https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/12/080

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free