Investigation of the association of Apgar score with maternal socio-economic and biological factors: An analysis of German perinatal statistics

27Citations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the relationship of 5-min Apgar score with maternal socio-economic and biological factors. Methods: We analyzed data from 465,964 singleton pregnancies (37-41 weeks' gestation) from the German perinatal statistics of 1998-2000. Using a logistic regression model we analyzed the incidence of low (0-6) 5-min Apgar scores in relation to these maternal factors: body mass index (BMI), age, previous live births, country of origin, occupation, single mother status, working during pregnancy, and smoking. Results: A low Apgar score was more common in overweight [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-1.40; P < 0.001] and obese [OR 1.92 (95% CI 1.67-2.20); P < 0.001] compared to normal weight women. A low Apgar score was also more common for women aged >35 years compared to those aged 20-35 years [OR 1.35 (95% CI 1.16-1.58); P < 0.001]. Furthermore, odds of a low Apgar score were higher for women with no previous live births compared to those with one or more previous live births [OR 1.52 (95% CI 1.37-1.70); P < 0.001]. Socio-economic factors did not convincingly influence Apgar scores. Conclusions: There was an influence of the biological maternal factors age, BMI, and parity on the 5-min Apgar score. There was no convincing effect of socio-economic factors on Apgar score in our study population. Possible reasons for this are discussed. © The Author(s) 2009. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Straube, S., Voigt, M., Jorch, G., Hallier, E., Briese, V., & Borchardt, U. (2010). Investigation of the association of Apgar score with maternal socio-economic and biological factors: An analysis of German perinatal statistics. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 282(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1217-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free