Distribution of ferric iron in some upper-mantle assemblages

292Citations
Citations of this article
141Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The distribution of ferric iron among the phases of uppermantle rocks, as a function of pressure (P), temperature (T) and bulk composition, has been studied using 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy to determine the Fe3+ / ∑ Fe ratios of mineral separates from 35 peridotite and pyroxenite samples. The whole-rock Fe3+ complement of a peridotite is typically shared approximately evenly among the major anhydrous phases (spinel and/ or garnet, orthopyroxene and clinopyroxene), with the important exception of olivine, which contains negligible Fe3+. Whole-rock Fe3+ contents are independent of the T and P of equilibration of the rock, but show a well-defined simple inverse correlation with the degree of depletion in a basaltic component. Fe3+ in spinel and in both pyroxenes from the spinel lherzplite facies shows a positive correlation with temperature, presumably owing to the decrease in the modal abundance of spinel. In garnet peridotites, the Fe3+ in garnet increases markedly with increasing T and P, whereas that in clinopyroxene remains approximately constant. The complex nature of the partitioning of Fe3+ between mantle phases results in complicated patterns of the activities of the Fe3+-bearing components, and thus in calculated equilibrium fo2, which show little correlation with whole-rock Fe3+Or degree of depletion. Whether Fe3+ is taken into account or ignored in calculating mineral formulae for geothermobarometry can have major effects on the resulting calculated T and P. For Fe-Mg exchange geothermometers, large errors must occur when applied to samples more oxidized or reduced than the experimental calibrations, whose fO2 conditions are largely unknown. Two-pyroxene thermometry is more immune to this problem, and probably provides the most reliable P-T estimates. Accordingly, the convergence of P-T values derived for a given garnet peridotite assemblage may not necessarily be indicative of mineral equilibrium. The prospects for the calculation of accurate Fe3+ contents from electron microprobe analyses by assuming stoichiometry are good for spinel, uncertain for garnet, and distinctly poor for pyroxenes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Canil, D., & O’Neill, H. S. C. (1996). Distribution of ferric iron in some upper-mantle assemblages. Journal of Petrology, 37(3), 609–635. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/37.3.609

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free