Facial Feminization Surgery: The Ethics of Gatekeeping in Transgender Health

84Citations
Citations of this article
127Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

The lack of access to gender-affirming surgery represents a significant unmet health care need within the transgender community, frequently resulting in depression and self-destructive behavior. While some transgender people may have access to gender reassignment surgery (GRS), an overwhelming majority cannot afford facial feminization surgery (FFS). The former may be covered as a “medical necessity,” but FFS is considered “cosmetic” and excluded from insurance coverage. This demarcation between “necessity” and “cosmetic” in transgender health care based on specific body parts is in direct opposition to the scientific community’s understanding of gender dysphoria and professional guidelines for transgender health. GRS affects one’s ability to function in an intimate relationship, while FFS has the same impact on social interactions an, therefore may have a far greater implication for one’s quality of life. FFS is a cost-effective intervention that needs to be covered by insurance policies. The benefits of such coverage far exceed the insignificant costs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dubov, A., & Fraenkel, L. (2018). Facial Feminization Surgery: The Ethics of Gatekeeping in Transgender Health. American Journal of Bioethics, 18(12), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2018.1531159

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free