Accountability gaps in the single supervisory mechanism (SSM) framework

12Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The first judgement of the General Court (EU) pertaining to the Single Supervision Mechanism (SSM) raised an issue concerning the source of the shared supervisory powers in the system of EU prudential supervision. In the General Court's view, the SSM Regulation conferred on the European Central Bank (ECB) exclusive powers to carry out specific prudential supervisory tasks vis-à-vis all euro area credit institutions (significant and less significant). At the same time, the ECB's national counterparts assist the former in implementing its supervisory tasks vis-à-vis less significant credit institutions. We argue that such a scheme requires a clear accountability relationship also between the ECB and the national competent authorities (NCAs), something that is not fully fledged in the current legal framework.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karagianni, A., & Scholten, M. (2020). Accountability gaps in the single supervisory mechanism (SSM) framework. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law. Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/UJIEL.463

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free