HnRNP G and Tra2β: Opposite effects on splicing matched by antagonism in RNA binding

85Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The hnRNP G family comprises three closely related proteins, hnRNP G, RBMY and hnRNP G-T. We showed previously that they interact with splicing activator proteins, particularly hTra2β, and suggested that they were involved in regulating Tra2-dependent splicing. We show here that hnRNP G and hTra2β have opposite effects upon the incorporation of several exons, both being able to act as either an activator or a repressor. HnRNP G acts via a specific sequence to repress the skeletal muscle-specific exon (SK) of human slow skeletal alpha-tropomyosin, TPM3, and stimulates inclusion of the alternative non-muscle exon. The binding of hnRNP G to the exon is antagonized by hTra2β. The two proteins also have opposite effects upon a dystrophin pseudo-exon. This exon is incorporated in a patient to a higher level in heart muscle than skeletal muscle, causing X-linked dilated cardiomyopathy. It is included to a higher level after transfection of a mini-gene into rodent cardiac myoblasts than into skeletal muscle myoblasts. Co-transfection with hnRNP G represses incorporation in cardiac myoblasts, whereas hTra2β increases it in skeletal myoblasts. Both the cell specificity and the protein responses depend upon exon sequences. Since the ratio of hnRNP G to Tra2β mRNA in humans is higher in skeletal muscle than in heart muscle, we propose that the hnRNP G/Tra2β ratio contributes to the cellular splicing preferences and that the higher proportion of hnRNP G in skeletal muscle plays a role in preventing the incorporation of the pseudo-exon and thus in preventing skeletal muscle dystrophy. © Oxford University Press 2001.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nasim, M. T., Chernova, T. K., Chowdhury, H. M., Yue, B. G., & Eperon, I. C. (2003). HnRNP G and Tra2β: Opposite effects on splicing matched by antagonism in RNA binding. Human Molecular Genetics, 12(11), 1337–1348. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddg136

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free