Comparative Performance of Neural Network Architectures in Gold Price Prediction: a Study of GRU, N-BEATS, LSTM and Hybrid Models

  • - G
  • - N
  • - D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study assesses the efficacy of a variety of neural network models in predicting gold prices, with a particular emphasis on GRU, N-BEATS, N-BEATS-GRU, N-BEATS-LSTM, and LSTM. We evaluated the models using a comprehensive dataset and metrics such as MSE, MAE, MAPE, and RMSE. The GRU model demonstrated the highest MAPE of 3.10%, as indicated by the results. N-BEATS was the second-best-performing model. In stark contrast to expectations, hybrid models, notably N-BEATS-LSTM, underperformed. Compared to LSTM-based models, visual analysis demonstrated that GRU and N-BEATS more effectively captured short-term and long-term trends. The results indicate that simplified models, such as GRU, may be more effective than complex hybrids in predicting gold prices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

-, G. T. A., -, N. A. A., & -, D. R. (2024). Comparative Performance of Neural Network Architectures in Gold Price Prediction: a Study of GRU, N-BEATS, LSTM and Hybrid Models. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i04.24040

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free