Comparison of several fixation methods for cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay

20Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Two fixation methods based on formaldehyde or acetone for qualitative cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay were evaluated on 405 consecutive blood samples. Cytomegalovirus was detected in 40 samples by the anti-genemia assay: 36 were detected by formaldehyde fixation; 22, by acetone; and 18, by both methods. Differences were statistically significant (P = 0.0043). In addition, four fixation methods (two based on formalin [with and without permeabilization] and two using acetone at different fixation times) for quantitative antigenemia assay in a different set of 32 samples from known viremic patients were evaluated. Formalin-based methods were superior to acetone-based methods, showing statistically significant differences in either the number of positive samples detected (P < 0.02; McNemar test) or the mean positive cell counts (P < 0.003; two-tailed Student's t test for paired samples). No differences between the two formalin-based methods were found. We recommend the formaldehyde fixation procedure without subsequent permeabilization because of its simplicity and sensitivity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Perez, J. L., De Ona, M., Niubo, J., Villar, H., Melon, S., Garcia, A., & Martin, R. (1995). Comparison of several fixation methods for cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 33(6), 1646–1649. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.33.6.1646-1649.1995

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free