The Category I mare (Kenney and Doig 1986): Expected foaling rate 80-90% - Fact or fiction?

22Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The subject of the present paper is a critical reflection on the categorization system of Kenney and Doig (1986) which is until now accepted internationally in the histopathological investigation of equine endometrial biopsies. Selected aspects of progress in equine gynecopathology made since 1986 are described and discussed under the view of clinical and prognostic relevance. It was concluded that the categorization neglects important histopathological findings (e.g. angioses, endometrial maldifferentiation) and is therefore incomplete. Beyond this schematized grading which means a reduction of the different findings to an arithmetical code, the biological complexity of etiology, reversibility, and possible interactions of the various alterations is more or less ignored. From the authors' point of view this is unacceptable from both medical and forensic aspects, especially under the conditions of the new German mercantile law.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schoon, H. A., & Schoon, D. (2003). The Category I mare (Kenney and Doig 1986): Expected foaling rate 80-90% - Fact or fiction? In Pferdeheilkunde (Vol. 19, pp. 698–701). Hippiatrika Verlagsgesellschaf. https://doi.org/10.21836/pem20030626

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free