Evaluation strategies in active learning in higher education in health: integrative review

11Citations
Citations of this article
99Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: to analyze scientific evidence on evaluation strategies for active learning methods in health undergraduate programs. Methods: integrative literature review in the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences, Nursing Database, Scopus, Web of Science and Education Resources Information Center databases. Results: different evaluation strategies are used: Presentation of seminars, Self-evaluation, Evaluation of student performance in Tutotest-Lite tutoring, Peer Evaluation, Active Learning and Critical Thinking Self-evaluation Scale, Objective and Structured Clinical Exam, Portfolio, Progressive Disclosure Questions, Modified Dissertation Questions, Progression Test, Dissertation Test, Objective Test, Immediate Learning Checks, Clinical Case Resolution and Cumulative Test. Final Considerations: evaluation strategies in active learning are used in combination, aiming at the affective, cognitive and psychomotor development of the student. However, studies with greater power of scientific evidence would be needed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lemes, M. A., Marin, M. J. S., Lazarini, C. A., Bocchi, S. C. M., & Higa, E. de F. R. (2021). Evaluation strategies in active learning in higher education in health: integrative review. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem. Associacao Brasilerira de Enfermagem. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-1055

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free