Implementation of a computer-guided consultation in the assessment of suspected obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome

5Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: We describe implementation of a clinical decision support system, a computer-guided consultation (CGC), in the assessment of subjects referred with suspected obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS). Methods: Two cohorts of patients were assessed. The first 100 cases had data collected with the CGC by a specialist sleep physician (stage1). A further 100 cases were assessed by a nonspecialist using the CGC (stage 2). For each case, the diagnosis suggested by the CGC was compared with the final diagnosis made by a second specialist sleep physician blinded to the CGC diagnosis. Results: Stage 1: of 100 people evaluated, a final diagnosis of OSAS was made by both the sleep specialist and CGC in 88% of cases. In 7 of the remaining 12 cases, both agreed there was “No evidence of OSAS”; in 5 cases the CGC did not reach a final diagnosis instead prompting specialist referral. Stage 2: 100 people were evaluated; 95% were evaluable. Both CGC and the sleep specialist made a diagnosis of OSAS in 83 cases (87%), in 5 cases both agreed there was no OSAS, whereas in 7 cases the CGC prompted a specialist review due to unexplained symptoms. The CGC was concordant with the final diagnosis in 95% and 93% of cases in the two cohorts, respectively and where there was doubt, prompted for clinical review. No OSAS cases were overlooked by the CGC. Conclusion: An intelligent CGC program creates opportunities in sleep medicine management pathways to safely yet effectively utilise nonspecialists working under specialist supervision.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chakrabarti, B., Lewis-Burke, N., Pearson, M., Craig, S., Davies, L., Sheridan, K., … Angus, R. (2020). Implementation of a computer-guided consultation in the assessment of suspected obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. ERJ Open Research, 6(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00362-2019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free