Neurocognitive and clinical predictors of long-term outcome in adolescents at ultra-high risk for psychosis: A 6-year follow-up

73Citations
Citations of this article
131Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Most studies aiming to predict transition to psychosis for individuals at ultra-high risk (UHR) have focused on either neurocognitive or clinical variables and have made little effort to combine the two. Furthermore, most have focused on a dichotomous measure of transition to psychosis rather than a continuous measure of functional outcome. We aimed to investigate the relative value of neurocognitive and clinical variables for predicting both transition to psychosis and functional outcome. Methods: Forty-three UHR individuals and 47 controls completed an extensive clinical and neurocognitive assessment at baseline and participated in long-term follow-up approximately six years later. UHR adolescents who had converted to psychosis (UHR-P; n = 10) were compared to individuals who had not (UHR-NP; n = 33) and controls on clinical and neurocognitive variables. Regression analyses were performed to determine which baseline measures best predicted transition to psychosis and long-term functional outcome for UHR individuals. Results: Low IQ was the single neurocognitive parameter that discriminated UHR-P individuals from UHR-NP individuals and controls. The severity of attenuated positive symptoms was the only significant predictor of a transition to psychosis and disorganized symptoms were highly predictive of functional outcome. Conclusions: Clinical measures are currently the most important vulnerability markers for long-term outcome in adolescents at imminent risk of psychosis. © 2014 Ziermans et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ziermans, T., De Wit, S., Schothorst, P., Sprong, M., Van Engeland, H., Kahn, R., & Durston, S. (2014). Neurocognitive and clinical predictors of long-term outcome in adolescents at ultra-high risk for psychosis: A 6-year follow-up. PLoS ONE, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093994

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free