Erratum: The True Cost of PFAS and the Benefits of Acting Now (Environ. Sci. Technol. (2021) 55:14 (9630−9633) DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c03565)

1Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

It has come to our attention that we inaccurately described recent water treatment changes and associated costs in North Carolina. Following extensive contamination by a PFAS manufacturer in the Cape Fear River watershed, Brunswick County, North Carolina is spending $167.3 million on a reverse osmosis plantand the Cape Fear Public Utility Authority spent $46 million on granular activated carbon filters (not $99 million as we originally reported), with recurring annual costs of $2.9 million.We regret the error. This does not change the conclusions or arguments of our paper.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cordner, A., Goldenman, G., Birnbaum, L. S., Brown, P., Miller, M. F., Mueller, R., … Trasande, L. (2021, September 21). Erratum: The True Cost of PFAS and the Benefits of Acting Now (Environ. Sci. Technol. (2021) 55:14 (9630−9633) DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c03565). Environmental Science and Technology. American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04938

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free