Social dominance orientation, language orientation, and deaf identity

20Citations
Citations of this article
104Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The notion of the Deaf community as a linguistic-cultural minority has been increasingly recognized and studied over the last two decades. However, significant differences of opinion and perspective within that population typically have been neglected in the literature. Social dominance orientation (SDO), a theoretical construct, typically focusing on intergroup perceptions and relations, is one aspect that has been left unexplored and might prove particularly enlightening. The present study investigated SDO among 119 deaf and 49 hearing young adults through a standardized SDO questionnaire. SDO was examined with regard to cultural identities (deaf, hearing, bicultural, and marginal), cochlear implant use, and language orientation (sign language or spoken language). The deaf participants were found to be more egalitarian than hearing individuals overall. Deaf individuals who held the strongest deaf identities, those who were sign language oriented, and not cochlear implant users, were the most egalitarian.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marschark, M., Zettler, I., & Dammeyer, J. (2017). Social dominance orientation, language orientation, and deaf identity. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 22(3), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enx018

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free