Eksistensi Hak Tanggungan dalam Kontrak Investasi Kolektif Efek Beragun Aset (KIK-EBA) sebagai Konsep Trusts

  • Rustam R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This research aims at discussing the problems concerning KIK-EBA agreement related to the existence of personality principles and ownership status of mortgage whose trust is secured in KIK-EBA. The problem discussed is related to any legal effects of the implementation of KIK-EBA as an agreement consisting of three parties on the existence of personality principles and related to the ownership status of mortgage in the securitization mechanism used in KIK-EBA. This was a normative research whose data were collected by using a library research method. The findings conclude that KIK-EBA is not an exception of personality principle; besides, since the formal condition of agreement is not fulfilled, KIK-EBA is null and void. The ownership of mortgage in KIK-EBA is still owned by the original creditor although purchase and sale of trust has occurred as a true sale in KIK-EBA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rustam, R. (2016). Eksistensi Hak Tanggungan dalam Kontrak Investasi Kolektif Efek Beragun Aset (KIK-EBA) sebagai Konsep Trusts. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 23(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol23.iss1.art4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free