Examination of necessity for pelvic drain placement after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

7Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Aim: Pelvic drain (PD) placement is commonly performed after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), but the need for PD placement is unclear. This study aimed to assess the need for PD placement after RARP. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study analysed the effect of PD placement on postoperative complications in patients who underwent RARP between 2009 and 2018. All patients prior to October 1, 2016 had a PD placed; those after did not. Results: Of the 308 study patients, 231 received a PD (PD group) and 77 did not (ND group). The incidence of ileus, urinary tract infection and anastomotic leak did not differ significantly between the groups; nor did the incidence of asymptomatic and symptomatic lymphocele at 2 weeks and 1 year after surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node dissection is a predictor of asymptomatic lymphocele development two weeks after surgery. Conclusion: PD placement is not necessary after RARP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

IWAMOTO, H., KADONO, Y., NAKAGAWA, R., MAKINO, T., KADOMOTO, S., YAEGASHI, H., … MIZOKAMI, A. (2021, October 1). Examination of necessity for pelvic drain placement after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. In Vivo. International Institute of Anticancer Research. https://doi.org/10.21873/INVIVO.12579

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free