Microbiological and sensory tests of beef treated with acetic and formic acids

74Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

One-centimeter cubes of the semimembranosus and adductor muscles of beef were inoculated with 5.2 X 106 of Salmonella typhimurium, Shigella sonnei, Yersinia enterocolitica, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Streptococcus faecalis. Exposure of the meat by dipping in 1.2% acetic acid for 10 s reduced averge numbers recoverable of these bacteria by 65%. E. coli was the most resistant, losing 46% of its viable cells. One-half of the acetic acid was replaced with 0.046% formic acid without loss in effectiveness. The rate of increase in antimicrobial effects of the treatment declined with time. Discoloration of the meat occurred after dipping in both 1.2% acetic acid, and 0.6% acetic plus 0.046% formic acids for 10 s. In triangle tests of flavor, panelists failed to differentiate samples of baked ground beef treated (before grinding) with 0.6% acetic acid and 0.046% formic acid from controls dipped in water (P<0.05). However, the same type of test showed a significant flavor difference between meat dipped in 1.2% acetic acid or distilled water.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bell, M. F., Marshall, R. T., & Anderson, M. E. (1986). Microbiological and sensory tests of beef treated with acetic and formic acids. Journal of Food Protection, 49(3), 207–210. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-49.3.207

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free